← Machine Learning Projects

Machine Learning Engineer Nanodegree

Convolutional Neural Networks

Project: Write an Algorithm for a Dog Identification App


In this notebook, some template code has already been provided for you, and you will need to implement additional functionality to successfully complete this project. You will not need to modify the included code beyond what is requested. Sections that begin with '(IMPLEMENTATION)' in the header indicate that the following block of code will require additional functionality which you must provide. Instructions will be provided for each section, and the specifics of the implementation are marked in the code block with a 'TODO' statement. Please be sure to read the instructions carefully!

Note: Once you have completed all of the code implementations, you need to finalize your work by exporting the iPython Notebook as an HTML document. Before exporting the notebook to html, all of the code cells need to have been run so that reviewers can see the final implementation and output. You can then export the notebook by using the menu above and navigating to \n", "File -> Download as -> HTML (.html). Include the finished document along with this notebook as your submission.

In addition to implementing code, there will be questions that you must answer which relate to the project and your implementation. Each section where you will answer a question is preceded by a 'Question X' header. Carefully read each question and provide thorough answers in the following text boxes that begin with 'Answer:'. Your project submission will be evaluated based on your answers to each of the questions and the implementation you provide.

Note: Code and Markdown cells can be executed using the Shift + Enter keyboard shortcut. Markdown cells can be edited by double-clicking the cell to enter edit mode.

The rubric contains optional "Stand Out Suggestions" for enhancing the project beyond the minimum requirements. If you decide to pursue the "Stand Out Suggestions", you should include the code in this IPython notebook.


Why We're Here

In this notebook, you will make the first steps towards developing an algorithm that could be used as part of a mobile or web app. At the end of this project, your code will accept any user-supplied image as input. If a dog is detected in the image, it will provide an estimate of the dog's breed. If a human is detected, it will provide an estimate of the dog breed that is most resembling. The image below displays potential sample output of your finished project (... but we expect that each student's algorithm will behave differently!).

Sample Dog Output

In this real-world setting, you will need to piece together a series of models to perform different tasks; for instance, the algorithm that detects humans in an image will be different from the CNN that infers dog breed. There are many points of possible failure, and no perfect algorithm exists. Your imperfect solution will nonetheless create a fun user experience!

The Road Ahead

We break the notebook into separate steps. Feel free to use the links below to navigate the notebook.

  • Step 0: Import Datasets
  • Step 1: Detect Humans
  • Step 2: Detect Dogs
  • Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)
  • Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 6: Write your Algorithm
  • Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

Step 0: Import Datasets

Import Dog Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of dog images. We populate a few variables through the use of the load_files function from the scikit-learn library:

  • train_files, valid_files, test_files - numpy arrays containing file paths to images
  • train_targets, valid_targets, test_targets - numpy arrays containing onehot-encoded classification labels
  • dog_names - list of string-valued dog breed names for translating labels
In [1]:
from sklearn.datasets import load_files       
from keras.utils import np_utils
import numpy as np
from glob import glob

# define function to load train, test, and validation datasets
def load_dataset(path):
    data = load_files(path)
    dog_files = np.array(data['filenames'])
    dog_targets = np_utils.to_categorical(np.array(data['target']), 133)
    return dog_files, dog_targets

# load train, test, and validation datasets
train_files, train_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/train')
valid_files, valid_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/valid')
test_files, test_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/test')

# load list of dog names
dog_names = [item[20:-1] for item in sorted(glob("dogImages/train/*/"))]

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total dog categories.' % len(dog_names))
print('There are %s total dog images.\n' % len(np.hstack([train_files, valid_files, test_files])))
print('There are %d training dog images.' % len(train_files))
print('There are %d validation dog images.' % len(valid_files))
print('There are %d test dog images.'% len(test_files))
Using TensorFlow backend.
There are 133 total dog categories.
There are 8351 total dog images.

There are 6680 training dog images.
There are 835 validation dog images.
There are 836 test dog images.

Import Human Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of human images, where the file paths are stored in the numpy array human_files.

In [2]:
import random
random.seed(8675309)

# load filenames in shuffled human dataset
human_files = np.array(glob("lfw/*/*"))
random.shuffle(human_files)

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total human images.' % len(human_files))
There are 13233 total human images.

Step 1: Detect Humans

We use OpenCV's implementation of Haar feature-based cascade classifiers to detect human faces in images. OpenCV provides many pre-trained face detectors, stored as XML files on github. We have downloaded one of these detectors and stored it in the haarcascades directory.

In the next code cell, we demonstrate how to use this detector to find human faces in a sample image.

In [3]:
import cv2                
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt                        
%matplotlib inline                               

# extract pre-trained face detector
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml')

# load color (BGR) image
img = cv2.imread(human_files[3])
# convert BGR image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)

# find faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)

# print number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# get bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # add bounding box to color image
    cv2.rectangle(img,(x,y),(x+w,y+h),(255,0,0),2)
    
# convert BGR image to RGB for plotting
cv_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# display the image, along with bounding box
plt.imshow(cv_rgb)
plt.show()
Number of faces detected: 1

Before using any of the face detectors, it is standard procedure to convert the images to grayscale. The detectMultiScale function executes the classifier stored in face_cascade and takes the grayscale image as a parameter.

In the above code, faces is a numpy array of detected faces, where each row corresponds to a detected face. Each detected face is a 1D array with four entries that specifies the bounding box of the detected face. The first two entries in the array (extracted in the above code as x and y) specify the horizontal and vertical positions of the top left corner of the bounding box. The last two entries in the array (extracted here as w and h) specify the width and height of the box.

Write a Human Face Detector

We can use this procedure to write a function that returns True if a human face is detected in an image and False otherwise. This function, aptly named face_detector, takes a string-valued file path to an image as input and appears in the code block below.

In [4]:
# returns "True" if face is detected in image stored at img_path
def face_detector(img_path):
    img = cv2.imread(img_path)
    gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
    faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
    return len(faces) > 0

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Human Face Detector

Question 1: Use the code cell below to test the performance of the face_detector function.

  • What percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face?
  • What percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face?

Ideally, we would like 100% of human images with a detected face and 0% of dog images with a detected face. You will see that our algorithm falls short of this goal, but still gives acceptable performance. We extract the file paths for the first 100 images from each of the datasets and store them in the numpy arrays human_files_short and dog_files_short.

Answer:

In [5]:
human_files_short = human_files[:100]
dog_files_short = train_files[:100]
# Do NOT modify the code above this line.

## TODO: Test the performance of the face_detector algorithm 
## on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
fd_human = [face_detector(fname) for fname in human_files_short]
percentage_human = 100*sum([f>0 for f in fd_human])/len(fd_human)
print(percentage_human,'% of the first 100 images in human_files had a human face detected in them.')
    
fd_dog = [face_detector(fname) for fname in dog_files_short]
percentage_dog = 100*sum([f>0 for f in fd_dog])/len(fd_dog)
print(percentage_dog,'% of the first 100 images in dog_files had a human face detected in them.')
98.0 % of the first 100 images in human_files had a human face detected in them.
11.0 % of the first 100 images in dog_files had a human face detected in them.

Question 2: This algorithmic choice necessitates that we communicate to the user that we accept human images only when they provide a clear view of a face (otherwise, we risk having unneccessarily frustrated users!). In your opinion, is this a reasonable expectation to pose on the user? If not, can you think of a way to detect humans in images that does not necessitate an image with a clearly presented face?

Answer:

This sounds like a reasonable expectation to pose on the user - it would be slightly unreasonable of the user to expect that our algorithm can detect people's profiles or indeed the back of their heads. It is a face classifier after all, not a holistic 'person' classifier. One way to detect humans in images that does not necessitate an image with a clearly presented face would be to focus heavily on individual features (ears, mouths, noses, eyes), so that if the classifier detected a part of a face then it could say that there was a person in the photo.

We suggest the face detector from OpenCV as a potential way to detect human images in your algorithm, but you are free to explore other approaches, especially approaches that make use of deep learning :). Please use the code cell below to design and test your own face detection algorithm. If you decide to pursue this optional task, report performance on each of the datasets.

In [6]:
## (Optional) TODO: Report the performance of another  
## face detection algorithm on the LFW dataset
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.

Step 2: Detect Dogs

In this section, we use a pre-trained ResNet-50 model to detect dogs in images. Our first line of code downloads the ResNet-50 model, along with weights that have been trained on ImageNet, a very large, very popular dataset used for image classification and other vision tasks. ImageNet contains over 10 million URLs, each linking to an image containing an object from one of 1000 categories. Given an image, this pre-trained ResNet-50 model returns a prediction (derived from the available categories in ImageNet) for the object that is contained in the image.

In [7]:
from keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50

# define ResNet50 model
ResNet50_model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet')

Pre-process the Data

When using TensorFlow as backend, Keras CNNs require a 4D array (which we'll also refer to as a 4D tensor) as input, with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, \text{rows}, \text{columns}, \text{channels}), $$

where nb_samples corresponds to the total number of images (or samples), and rows, columns, and channels correspond to the number of rows, columns, and channels for each image, respectively.

The path_to_tensor function below takes a string-valued file path to a color image as input and returns a 4D tensor suitable for supplying to a Keras CNN. The function first loads the image and resizes it to a square image that is $224 \times 224$ pixels. Next, the image is converted to an array, which is then resized to a 4D tensor. In this case, since we are working with color images, each image has three channels. Likewise, since we are processing a single image (or sample), the returned tensor will always have shape

$$ (1, 224, 224, 3). $$

The paths_to_tensor function takes a numpy array of string-valued image paths as input and returns a 4D tensor with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, 224, 224, 3). $$

Here, nb_samples is the number of samples, or number of images, in the supplied array of image paths. It is best to think of nb_samples as the number of 3D tensors (where each 3D tensor corresponds to a different image) in your dataset!

In [8]:
from keras.preprocessing import image                  
from tqdm import tqdm

def path_to_tensor(img_path):
    # loads RGB image as PIL.Image.Image type
    img = image.load_img(img_path, target_size=(224, 224))
    # convert PIL.Image.Image type to 3D tensor with shape (224, 224, 3)
    x = image.img_to_array(img)
    # convert 3D tensor to 4D tensor with shape (1, 224, 224, 3) and return 4D tensor
    return np.expand_dims(x, axis=0)

def paths_to_tensor(img_paths):
    list_of_tensors = [path_to_tensor(img_path) for img_path in tqdm(img_paths)]
    return np.vstack(list_of_tensors)

Making Predictions with ResNet-50

Getting the 4D tensor ready for ResNet-50, and for any other pre-trained model in Keras, requires some additional processing. First, the RGB image is converted to BGR by reordering the channels. All pre-trained models have the additional normalization step that the mean pixel (expressed in RGB as $[103.939, 116.779, 123.68]$ and calculated from all pixels in all images in ImageNet) must be subtracted from every pixel in each image. This is implemented in the imported function preprocess_input. If you're curious, you can check the code for preprocess_input here.

Now that we have a way to format our image for supplying to ResNet-50, we are now ready to use the model to extract the predictions. This is accomplished with the predict method, which returns an array whose $i$-th entry is the model's predicted probability that the image belongs to the $i$-th ImageNet category. This is implemented in the ResNet50_predict_labels function below.

By taking the argmax of the predicted probability vector, we obtain an integer corresponding to the model's predicted object class, which we can identify with an object category through the use of this dictionary.

In [9]:
from keras.applications.resnet50 import preprocess_input, decode_predictions

def ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path):
    # returns prediction vector for image located at img_path
    img = preprocess_input(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    return np.argmax(ResNet50_model.predict(img))

Write a Dog Detector

While looking at the dictionary, you will notice that the categories corresponding to dogs appear in an uninterrupted sequence and correspond to dictionary keys 151-268, inclusive, to include all categories from 'Chihuahua' to 'Mexican hairless'. Thus, in order to check to see if an image is predicted to contain a dog by the pre-trained ResNet-50 model, we need only check if the ResNet50_predict_labels function above returns a value between 151 and 268 (inclusive).

We use these ideas to complete the dog_detector function below, which returns True if a dog is detected in an image (and False if not).

In [10]:
### returns "True" if a dog is detected in the image stored at img_path
def dog_detector(img_path):
    prediction = ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path)
    return ((prediction <= 268) & (prediction >= 151)) 

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Dog Detector

Question 3: Use the code cell below to test the performance of your dog_detector function.

  • What percentage of the images in human_files_short have a detected dog?
  • What percentage of the images in dog_files_short have a detected dog?

Answer:

In [11]:
### TODO: Test the performance of the dog_detector function
### on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.

dd_human = [dog_detector(fname) for fname in human_files_short]
dpercentage_human = 100*sum([f>0 for f in dd_human])/len(dd_human)
print(dpercentage_human,'% of the first 100 images in human_files had a dog detected in them.')
    
dd_dog = [dog_detector(fname) for fname in dog_files_short]
dpercentage_dog = 100*sum([f>0 for f in dd_dog])/len(dd_dog)
print(dpercentage_dog,'% of the first 100 images in dog_files had a dog detected in them.')
1.0 % of the first 100 images in human_files had a dog detected in them.
100.0 % of the first 100 images in dog_files had a dog detected in them.

Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)

Now that we have functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, we need a way to predict breed from images. In this step, you will create a CNN that classifies dog breeds. You must create your CNN from scratch (so, you can't use transfer learning yet!), and you must attain a test accuracy of at least 1%. In Step 5 of this notebook, you will have the opportunity to use transfer learning to create a CNN that attains greatly improved accuracy.

Be careful with adding too many trainable layers! More parameters means longer training, which means you are more likely to need a GPU to accelerate the training process. Thankfully, Keras provides a handy estimate of the time that each epoch is likely to take; you can extrapolate this estimate to figure out how long it will take for your algorithm to train.

We mention that the task of assigning breed to dogs from images is considered exceptionally challenging. To see why, consider that even a human would have great difficulty in distinguishing between a Brittany and a Welsh Springer Spaniel.

Brittany Welsh Springer Spaniel

It is not difficult to find other dog breed pairs with minimal inter-class variation (for instance, Curly-Coated Retrievers and American Water Spaniels).

Curly-Coated Retriever American Water Spaniel

Likewise, recall that labradors come in yellow, chocolate, and black. Your vision-based algorithm will have to conquer this high intra-class variation to determine how to classify all of these different shades as the same breed.

Yellow Labrador Chocolate Labrador Black Labrador

We also mention that random chance presents an exceptionally low bar: setting aside the fact that the classes are slightly imabalanced, a random guess will provide a correct answer roughly 1 in 133 times, which corresponds to an accuracy of less than 1%.

Remember that the practice is far ahead of the theory in deep learning. Experiment with many different architectures, and trust your intuition. And, of course, have fun!

Pre-process the Data

We rescale the images by dividing every pixel in every image by 255.

In [12]:
from PIL import ImageFile                            
ImageFile.LOAD_TRUNCATED_IMAGES = True                 

# pre-process the data for Keras
train_tensors = paths_to_tensor(train_files).astype('float32')/255
valid_tensors = paths_to_tensor(valid_files).astype('float32')/255
test_tensors = paths_to_tensor(test_files).astype('float32')/255
100%|██████████| 6680/6680 [03:40<00:00, 30.29it/s]
100%|██████████| 835/835 [00:26<00:00, 30.93it/s]
100%|██████████| 836/836 [00:22<00:00, 53.86it/s]

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    model.summary()

We have imported some Python modules to get you started, but feel free to import as many modules as you need. If you end up getting stuck, here's a hint that specifies a model that trains relatively fast on CPU and attains >1% test accuracy in 5 epochs:

Sample CNN

Question 4: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. If you chose to use the hinted architecture above, describe why you think that CNN architecture should work well for the image classification task.

Answer:

I decided to use the hinted architecture above as a base because I thought that using a series of convolutional layers with increasing filter size would allow the network to pick up increasingly complex patterns in the distinctions between the dog breeds (which as outlined above is difficult to do with the naked eye). I also reasoned that having a pooling layer between each convolutional layer would increase the training efficiency of our model. I did decrease the number of filters in each convolutional layer because my intuition is that simpler models seem to perform better than more complex ones.

In [13]:
from keras.layers import Conv2D, MaxPooling2D, GlobalAveragePooling2D
from keras.layers import Dropout, Flatten, Dense
from keras.models import Sequential

model = Sequential()

### TODO: Define your architecture.

model.add(Conv2D(filters=8, kernel_size=2, input_shape=(224, 224, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2, data_format='channels_last'))
model.add(Conv2D(filters=16, kernel_size=2, activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2, data_format='channels_last'))
model.add(Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=2, activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2, data_format='channels_last'))
model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D())
model.add(Dense(133, activation='relu'))

model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv2d_1 (Conv2D)            (None, 223, 223, 8)       104       
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_2 (MaxPooling2 (None, 111, 111, 8)       0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_2 (Conv2D)            (None, 110, 110, 16)      528       
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_3 (MaxPooling2 (None, 55, 55, 16)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_3 (Conv2D)            (None, 54, 54, 32)        2080      
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_4 (MaxPooling2 (None, 27, 27, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
global_average_pooling2d_1 ( (None, 32)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_1 (Dense)              (None, 133)               4389      
=================================================================
Total params: 7,101
Trainable params: 7,101
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [14]:
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy')

#metrics=['accuracy'] the code wouldn't compile when this was included, and I can't understand why

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [15]:
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint  

### TODO: specify the number of epochs that you would like to use to train the model.

epochs = 5

### Do NOT modify the code below this line.

checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

model.fit(train_tensors, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_tensors, valid_targets),
          epochs=epochs, batch_size=20, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/5
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 11.8121  Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 12.25062, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 235s - loss: 11.8136 - val_loss: 12.2506
Epoch 2/5
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 12.8479  Epoch 00001: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 212s - loss: 12.8497 - val_loss: 13.6322
Epoch 3/5
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 14.2939  Epoch 00002: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 210s - loss: 14.2951 - val_loss: 15.0947
Epoch 4/5
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 15.2424  Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 211s - loss: 15.2429 - val_loss: 15.0783
Epoch 5/5
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 14.7852  Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 211s - loss: 14.7813 - val_loss: 14.1186
Out[15]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x118310a90>

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [16]:
model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5')

Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 1%.

In [17]:
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
dog_breed_predictions = [np.argmax(model.predict(np.expand_dims(tensor, axis=0))) for tensor in test_tensors]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(dog_breed_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(dog_breed_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 1.1962%

Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds

To reduce training time without sacrificing accuracy, we show you how to train a CNN using transfer learning. In the following step, you will get a chance to use transfer learning to train your own CNN.

Obtain Bottleneck Features

In [18]:
bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogVGG16Data.npz')
train_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['test']

Model Architecture

The model uses the the pre-trained VGG-16 model as a fixed feature extractor, where the last convolutional output of VGG-16 is fed as input to our model. We only add a global average pooling layer and a fully connected layer, where the latter contains one node for each dog category and is equipped with a softmax.

In [19]:
VGG16_model = Sequential()
VGG16_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=train_VGG16.shape[1:]))
VGG16_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

VGG16_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_2 ( (None, 512)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_2 (Dense)              (None, 133)               68229     
=================================================================
Total params: 68,229
Trainable params: 68,229
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [20]:
VGG16_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='rmsprop')

#, metrics=['accuracy'] still not working

Train the Model

In [21]:
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

VGG16_model.fit(train_VGG16, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_VGG16, valid_targets),
          epochs=20, batch_size=20, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 12.5450  Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 11.28167, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 6s - loss: 12.5388 - val_loss: 11.2817
Epoch 2/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 10.6791Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 11.28167 to 10.56662, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 10.6709 - val_loss: 10.5666
Epoch 3/20
6540/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 10.1698Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 10.56662 to 10.45801, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 10.1732 - val_loss: 10.4580
Epoch 4/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 10.0012Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 10.45801 to 10.26384, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 10.0008 - val_loss: 10.2638
Epoch 5/20
6620/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.8460 Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 10.26384 to 10.12343, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.8420 - val_loss: 10.1234
Epoch 6/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.7048 Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 10.12343 to 10.05281, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.7026 - val_loss: 10.0528
Epoch 7/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.6330 Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 10.05281 to 10.02284, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.6405 - val_loss: 10.0228
Epoch 8/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5883 Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 10.02284 to 9.99510, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.5856 - val_loss: 9.9951
Epoch 9/20
6620/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5426 Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.5350 - val_loss: 10.0464
Epoch 10/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5050 Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 9.99510 to 9.97207, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.5084 - val_loss: 9.9721
Epoch 11/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.4389Epoch 00010: val_loss improved from 9.97207 to 9.77914, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.4416 - val_loss: 9.7791
Epoch 12/20
6620/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.2065Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 9.77914 to 9.65911, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.2059 - val_loss: 9.6591
Epoch 13/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1566 Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.1550 - val_loss: 9.6962
Epoch 14/20
6520/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1229 Epoch 00013: val_loss improved from 9.65911 to 9.62364, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.1433 - val_loss: 9.6236
Epoch 15/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.0655Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 9.62364 to 9.52644, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 9.0451 - val_loss: 9.5264
Epoch 16/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.9162Epoch 00015: val_loss improved from 9.52644 to 9.51116, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 8.9183 - val_loss: 9.5112
Epoch 17/20
6540/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.8059Epoch 00016: val_loss improved from 9.51116 to 9.33378, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 8.8084 - val_loss: 9.3338
Epoch 18/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.7221Epoch 00017: val_loss improved from 9.33378 to 9.30107, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 8.7181 - val_loss: 9.3011
Epoch 19/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.6551Epoch 00018: val_loss improved from 9.30107 to 9.30021, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 8.6818 - val_loss: 9.3002
Epoch 20/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.6118Epoch 00019: val_loss improved from 9.30021 to 9.26128, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 2s - loss: 8.6313 - val_loss: 9.2613
Out[21]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x119df8ba8>

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [22]:
VGG16_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5')

Test the Model

Now, we can use the CNN to test how well it identifies breed within our test dataset of dog images. We print the test accuracy below.

In [23]:
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
VGG16_predictions = [np.argmax(VGG16_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_VGG16]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(VGG16_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(VGG16_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 38.3971%

Predict Dog Breed with the Model

In [24]:
from extract_bottleneck_features import *

def VGG16_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_VGG16(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = VGG16_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]

Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)

You will now use transfer learning to create a CNN that can identify dog breed from images. Your CNN must attain at least 60% accuracy on the test set.

In Step 4, we used transfer learning to create a CNN using VGG-16 bottleneck features. In this section, you must use the bottleneck features from a different pre-trained model. To make things easier for you, we have pre-computed the features for all of the networks that are currently available in Keras:

The files are encoded as such:

Dog{network}Data.npz

where {network}, in the above filename, can be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception. Pick one of the above architectures, download the corresponding bottleneck features, and store the downloaded file in the bottleneck_features/ folder in the repository.

(IMPLEMENTATION) Obtain Bottleneck Features

In the code block below, extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the train, test, and validation sets by running the following:

bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/Dog{network}Data.npz')
train_{network} = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_{network} = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_{network} = bottleneck_features['test']
In [25]:
### TODO: Obtain bottleneck features from another pre-trained CNN.

bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogXceptionData.npz')
train_Xception = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_Xception = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_Xception = bottleneck_features['test']

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    <your model's name>.summary()

Question 5: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. Describe why you think the architecture is suitable for the current problem.

Answer:

My reasoning for using this architecture is that seemed to work reasonably well for the VGG16 model above, which was also an example of transfer learning. If it didn't perform well I would have altered it with the goal of increasing its accuracy; it ended up performing well above the 60% accuracy threshold (84%), so I kept it as it was. I think the architecture is suitable for the current problem because the Xception bottleneck features are already designed for image classification on ImageNet, so we wouldn't need to add more layers than a GAP layer and Dense layer.

In [26]:
### TODO: Define your architecture.

Xception_model = Sequential()
Xception_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=(train_Xception.shape[1:])))
Xception_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

Xception_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_3 ( (None, 2048)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_3 (Dense)              (None, 133)               272517    
=================================================================
Total params: 272,517
Trainable params: 272,517
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

(IMPLEMENTATION) Compile the Model

In [27]:
### TODO: Compile the model.

Xception_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='rmsprop')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [28]:
### TODO: Train the model.

checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.Xception.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

Xception_model.fit(train_Xception, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_Xception, valid_targets),
          epochs=20, batch_size=20, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 1.0669   - ETA: 2s - loss: 1.1741Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 0.51229, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.Xception.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 14s - loss: 1.0634 - val_loss: 0.5123
Epoch 2/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3984  - ETA: 8s - loss: 0.3763Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 0.51229 to 0.47146, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.Xception.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 13s - loss: 0.3981 - val_loss: 0.4715
Epoch 3/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3197  - ETA: 10s - loss: 0.2816 - ETA: 2s - loss: 0.3175Epoch 00002: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 13s - loss: 0.3198 - val_loss: 0.4819
Epoch 4/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2756 Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 13s - loss: 0.2754 - val_loss: 0.4823
Epoch 5/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2408  - ETA: 4s - loss: 0.2376Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 12s - loss: 0.2416 - val_loss: 0.5166
Epoch 6/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2186 Epoch 00005: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 13s - loss: 0.2187 - val_loss: 0.5398
Epoch 7/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1931 Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 12s - loss: 0.1927 - val_loss: 0.5281
Epoch 8/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1756Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 12s - loss: 0.1755 - val_loss: 0.5701
Epoch 9/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1589Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 11s - loss: 0.1583 - val_loss: 0.5435
Epoch 10/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1468Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.1472 - val_loss: 0.5666
Epoch 11/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1331 - ETA: 7s - loss: 0.0887Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 11s - loss: 0.1346 - val_loss: 0.5814
Epoch 12/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1236Epoch 00011: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.1245 - val_loss: 0.5956
Epoch 13/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1133Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.1133 - val_loss: 0.6231
Epoch 14/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1072 - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1083Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.1069 - val_loss: 0.6026
Epoch 15/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0974 - ETA: 1s - loss: 0.1022Epoch 00014: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.0972 - val_loss: 0.6174
Epoch 16/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0887Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 12s - loss: 0.0884 - val_loss: 0.6601
Epoch 17/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0868Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.0866 - val_loss: 0.6481
Epoch 18/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0825 - ETA: 4s - loss: 0.0744Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 11s - loss: 0.0827 - val_loss: 0.6657
Epoch 19/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0752Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.0750 - val_loss: 0.6824
Epoch 20/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0691 - ETA: 5s - loss: 0.0614Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 10s - loss: 0.0693 - val_loss: 0.6995
Out[28]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x119b899b0>

(IMPLEMENTATION) Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [29]:
### TODO: Load the model weights with the best validation loss.

Xception_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.Xception.hdf5')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 60%.

In [30]:
### TODO: Calculate classification accuracy on the test dataset.

# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
Xception_predictions = [np.argmax(Xception_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_Xception]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(Xception_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(Xception_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 84.3301%

(IMPLEMENTATION) Predict Dog Breed with the Model

Write a function that takes an image path as input and returns the dog breed (Affenpinscher, Afghan_hound, etc) that is predicted by your model.

Similar to the analogous function in Step 5, your function should have three steps:

  1. Extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the chosen CNN model.
  2. Supply the bottleneck features as input to the model to return the predicted vector. Note that the argmax of this prediction vector gives the index of the predicted dog breed.
  3. Use the dog_names array defined in Step 0 of this notebook to return the corresponding breed.

The functions to extract the bottleneck features can be found in extract_bottleneck_features.py, and they have been imported in an earlier code cell. To obtain the bottleneck features corresponding to your chosen CNN architecture, you need to use the function

extract_{network}

where {network}, in the above filename, should be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception.

In [31]:
### TODO: Write a function that takes a path to an image as input
### and returns the dog breed that is predicted by the model.

def Xception_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_Xception(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = Xception_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]

Step 6: Write your Algorithm

Write an algorithm that accepts a file path to an image and first determines whether the image contains a human, dog, or neither. Then,

  • if a dog is detected in the image, return the predicted breed.
  • if a human is detected in the image, return the resembling dog breed.
  • if neither is detected in the image, provide output that indicates an error.

You are welcome to write your own functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, but feel free to use the face_detector and dog_detector functions developed above. You are required to use your CNN from Step 5 to predict dog breed.

Some sample output for our algorithm is provided below, but feel free to design your own user experience!

Sample Human Output

(IMPLEMENTATION) Write your Algorithm

In [32]:
### TODO: Write your algorithm.
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.
from IPython.core.display import Image, display

def dog_breed_algorithm(img_path):
    display(Image(img_path,width=200,height=200))
    if dog_detector(img_path) == 1:
        print("This is believed to be a dog. Its predicted breed is: ")
        return Xception_predict_breed(img_path)
    elif face_detector(img_path) == 1:
        print("This is believed to be a human. Its predicted breed is: ")
        return Xception_predict_breed(img_path)
    else:
        return print("Could not identify a human or dog in the chosen image. Try again.")

Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

In this section, you will take your new algorithm for a spin! What kind of dog does the algorithm think that you look like? If you have a dog, does it predict your dog's breed accurately? If you have a cat, does it mistakenly think that your cat is a dog?

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test Your Algorithm on Sample Images!

Test your algorithm at least six images on your computer. Feel free to use any images you like. Use at least two human and two dog images.

Question 6: Is the output better than you expected :) ? Or worse :( ? Provide at least three possible points of improvement for your algorithm.

Answer:

It's a little bit worse than I expected, but still very entertaining nonetheless. It managed to predict the breed of dogs I gave it decently well (3.5/6 correct, the 0.5 for predicting an American_foxhound for a beagle). It struggled to identify my poodle Katie on a chair far away from the camera or close up, though this is likely due to her having a very shaven haircut at the time the pictures were taken. It also predicted that my cat was a human, and wasn't able to recognise my brother as human at all (which was very amusing). Three points of improvement for the algorithm would be better being able to recognise dogs in images with noise (though this is likely due to the images it was trained on), being better able to recognise humans, and potentially having more variety in the types of breeds it predicts for humans (it predicted Dachshund twice and Chinese_Crested twice).

In [34]:
## TODO: Execute your algorithm from Step 6 on
## at least 6 images on your computer.
## Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.

print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/dad.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/mum.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/andrew.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Elizabeth.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Sophie.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Phoebie.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Katie.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Luna.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Katie2.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Teddy.jpg'))
print(dog_breed_algorithm('/Users/Christopher/Downloads/Callie.jpg'))
This is believed to be a human. Its predicted breed is: 
Dachshund
This is believed to be a human. Its predicted breed is: 
Cocker_spaniel
Could not identify a human or dog in the chosen image. Try again.
None
This is believed to be a human. Its predicted breed is: 
Dachshund
This is believed to be a dog. Its predicted breed is: 
Poodle
This is believed to be a dog. Its predicted breed is: 
Poodle
This is believed to be a human. Its predicted breed is: 
Chinese_crested
This is believed to be a dog. Its predicted breed is: 
American_foxhound
This is believed to be a dog. Its predicted breed is: 
Bedlington_terrier
This is believed to be a dog. Its predicted breed is: 
German_shepherd_dog
This is believed to be a human. Its predicted breed is: 
Chinese_crested